heauristic bean resolution

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-21 06:55:55 +02:00
parent f9e6247eb3
commit 073df21395
4 changed files with 304 additions and 150 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
package click.kamil.springstatemachineexporter.analysis.enricher.routing;
import click.kamil.springstatemachineexporter.analysis.model.CallChain;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import java.util.Arrays;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
@Tag("heuristic_bean_resolution")
public class HeuristicRoutingEngineTest {
private final HeuristicRoutingEngine engine = new HeuristicRoutingEngine();
@Test
public void testDeepPackageDivergenceMismatch() {
// This is the bug case: sharing a deep root, but diverging into different domains
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.corp.division.project.orders.OrderService.pay()"))
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.corp.division.project.payments.PaymentStateMachine";
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// They share com.acme.corp.division.project, but diverge into orders vs payments
// This should be a strong mismatch, so it should return false
assertFalse(result, "Deep package divergence into different domains should be rejected");
}
@Test
public void testSameDomainMatch() {
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.ecommerce.orders.OrderService.process()"))
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.ecommerce.orders.OrderStateMachine";
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// Same exact domain, should match
assertTrue(result, "Same domain should be accepted");
}
@Test
public void testSubPackageMatch() {
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.ecommerce.orders.impl.OrderServiceImpl.process()"))
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.ecommerce.orders.OrderStateMachine";
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// Subpackage should match
assertTrue(result, "Sub-packages of the same domain should be accepted");
}
@Test
public void testSharedDomainTermMatch() {
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.orders.web.OrderController.submit()"))
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.orders.service.OrderStateMachine";
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// Different subpackages, but they share the "order" domain term and common prefix
assertTrue(result, "Divergent packages that share a domain term should be accepted");
}
@Test
public void testExplicitTargetVariableMatch() {
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.common.GlobalTrigger.fire()"))
.contextMachineId("paymentStateMachine") // Explicitly targets payment
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.corp.payments.PaymentStateMachine";
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// Mismatched domains, but explicit variable targeting works
assertTrue(result, "Explicit variable target matching the machine name should be accepted");
}
@Test
public void testExplicitTargetVariableMismatch() {
CallChain chain = CallChain.builder()
.methodChain(Arrays.asList("com.acme.common.GlobalTrigger.fire()"))
.contextMachineId("paymentStateMachine") // Explicitly targets payment
.build();
String machineName = "com.acme.corp.orders.OrderStateMachine"; // But this is Order
boolean result = engine.isRoutedToCorrectMachine(chain, machineName);
// Explicit variable targeting completely conflicts
assertFalse(result, "Explicit variable target mismatching the machine name should be rejected");
}
}